Thursday, March 20, 2008
Moby Dick and it's Political Symbolism
Herman Melville himself was very active in the politics of the mid-19th Century in America and used his novel Moby Dick as an allegory representative of many factual, historical events leading up to and including the Compromise of 1850. Melville symbolically created the Pequod's crew to coincide with a lot of the American ideologies with which he fervently disagreed. Among these were the idea of Manifest Destiny, the Mexican-American War, and racial and ethnic inequalities. Through Ahab himself, the ship mates, and harpooners, Melville was able to characterize many of the pockets of people within United States. He was also able to symbolically capture the stories of the people who conversely felt the wrath of America's endless growing. Throughout the novel there are small instances of symbology relating back to Melville's idea that the path America was taking in foreign and domestic relations would eventually lead to its ultimate demise.
Moby Dick and American Political Symbolism
Herman Melville wrote Moby Dick during a time of great political turmoil. In 1850 the United States of America was on the brink of civil war as the North and South became increasingly estranged over issues of expansionism and slavery. In his essay “Moby Dick and American Political Symbolism” Alan Heimert argues that Melville, who was extremely concerned with the future of the Union and the Democratic Party, used America’s political climate during the tumultuous years preceding the Compromise of 1850 as an endless source of inspiration for his masterpiece. John C. Calhoun, Daniel Webster, both the Whig and Democratic parties, and even the U.S. as a whole are depicted in Melville’s epic tale.
Ishmael’s perspective is likely that of Melville’s own. It is a hopeful vision of the future of the Union: even if the “ship” that is the Union gets torn apart, there will still be fragments onto which those faithful to democracy can cling (Heimert 527).
The “White Whale,” also known as Moby Dick, could have possibly been modeled after Daniel Webster.
Ahab might symbolize Calhoun, or perhaps the South in general. Fedallah may represent traditional Northern thought on African Americans at the time, or possibly his character is there to illustrate the way slavery has served as a catalyst, accelerating the South down their destructive path.
Ishmael’s perspective is likely that of Melville’s own. It is a hopeful vision of the future of the Union: even if the “ship” that is the Union gets torn apart, there will still be fragments onto which those faithful to democracy can cling (Heimert 527).
The “White Whale,” also known as Moby Dick, could have possibly been modeled after Daniel Webster.
Ahab might symbolize Calhoun, or perhaps the South in general. Fedallah may represent traditional Northern thought on African Americans at the time, or possibly his character is there to illustrate the way slavery has served as a catalyst, accelerating the South down their destructive path.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Slave to the Great White: The Large Symbol That is Moby Dick
In “Moby Dick and American Political Symbolism” Alan Heimert looks at Moby Dick as a symbol for all of the political feuds during the 1850’s. It is a must read before attempting to tackle the beast of a novel that is, Moby Dick which dives into great issues such as slavery as well as The Compromise of 1850. Alan Heimert gives a harsh but accurate account of who each of the major characters may be based off as, as well as who the other boats they encounter could be. Who knew there could be so much historical representation in such a seemingly already dense book.
Identifying the Destroyer: The Impact of the Pequod's Historical Context on the Novel
As Louis Heller writes in his essay “Two Pequot Names in American Literature,” the name Pequod may be as elemental as Melville suggests in Chapter XVI “The Ship” when he says “you will no doubt remember that was name of a celebrated tribe of Massachusetts Indians, now extinct as ancient Medes.” While perhaps readers may have been familiar with the Pequod tribe in Melville’s time, today, the narrator’s seemingly strange assumption creates more humor than significant historical or literary meaning. Historically, the Pequot tribe was originally part of the Algonquin Mohegans. When this tribe moved south into Eastern Connecticut they antagonized and dominated neighboring tribes in the area. As such, the fearful members of surrounding tribes began calling them the Pequots, meaning “destroyers.” This essay examines Melville’s possible intentions for using the name Pequod in terms of how its historical significance may impact Melville’s agent of destruction within his novel.
Moby Dick: Understanding Melville and His Time
America had some of its greatest authors during the 19th century. This period, also known as “the American renaissance”, was the essential beginning of American literature as the country will still very young. Writers like Thoreau, Emerson, Poe, Whitman, Hawthorne, and Herman Melville were the featured authors of the renaissance. Melville’s probably most known work, Moby Dick, is recognized as a huge part of this period. Any person that is generally familiar with American literature understands the importance and impact that was created by this white-whale of a novel. However, Moby Dick is anything but a simple voyage to hunt down a monolithic whale. Anyone who wants to read the novel with more understanding must appreciate the background of Herman Melville and when he wrote the novel. The author’s experiences and time on the high seas traveling around the world helped make Moby Dick great. Who would have thought there would be philosophy in whales or poetry in blubber? Few novels that deal in metaphysics, or claim to be the descent of muses, contain as much true viewpoint and as much genuine poetry as the tale of the Pequod’s whaling expedition.
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Fanny Fern: Breaking the barrier for Women
In “The Scribbling Woman and Fanny Fern: Why Women Wrote Ann D. Wood made it conscious to the public that women writers were existent and that women wrote because writing was a form of expression for them and in some cases if they were to succeed help them economically. One of the many reasons why Ruth Hall was so famous in the 19th Century was because she was able to write about the struggles that many women had to overcome.
As I was doing research on my paper it became evident to me that during this time men felt threatened by women’s writings because women tended to focus issues that affected them as women and they took a more realistic approach in their writings. It was fascinating and at the same time shocking to find that men were harshly critical towards women. For example, Hawthorne stated that “Fanny Fern” writes as if the devil was in her and he went on to say that, that is the only condition under which a woman ever writes anything worth reading. I just couldn’t make sense of why men didn’t want to welcome women into the literary world.
As I was doing research on my paper it became evident to me that during this time men felt threatened by women’s writings because women tended to focus issues that affected them as women and they took a more realistic approach in their writings. It was fascinating and at the same time shocking to find that men were harshly critical towards women. For example, Hawthorne stated that “Fanny Fern” writes as if the devil was in her and he went on to say that, that is the only condition under which a woman ever writes anything worth reading. I just couldn’t make sense of why men didn’t want to welcome women into the literary world.
The Hidden Agendas of Female Authors
Ann Douglas Wood's essay "The Scribbling Woman and Fanny Fern: Why Women Wrote" discusses why various women writers published work during the ninteenth century- a time when society demanded women be confined to domestic duties and childcare.
Many female authors were in fact widows, or otherwise disadvantaged by the lack of a male supporter, but still tried desperately to maintain their "femininity." They made excuses for why they must work and tirelessly worked to maintain their delicacy by apologizing and justifying through religion and family.
Fern was significant because she made no apologies for her opinions and beliefs.
Fern essentially argues that women needed to write in order to maintain their sanity and survive. They needed a creative outlet beyond cooking and cleaning that allowed for self-expression.
Fern did not necessarily become a writer by choice- originally it was a way for her and her daughters to survive. She therefore felt no guilt or remorse for her work, despite its harsh stance on male roles in society, because she believed that if men wanted their women to be frail and dependent then they should take care of them- if not how could they expect women to not turn into an independent and resourceful person like Ruth Hall?
Many female authors were in fact widows, or otherwise disadvantaged by the lack of a male supporter, but still tried desperately to maintain their "femininity." They made excuses for why they must work and tirelessly worked to maintain their delicacy by apologizing and justifying through religion and family.
Fern was significant because she made no apologies for her opinions and beliefs.
Fern essentially argues that women needed to write in order to maintain their sanity and survive. They needed a creative outlet beyond cooking and cleaning that allowed for self-expression.
Fern did not necessarily become a writer by choice- originally it was a way for her and her daughters to survive. She therefore felt no guilt or remorse for her work, despite its harsh stance on male roles in society, because she believed that if men wanted their women to be frail and dependent then they should take care of them- if not how could they expect women to not turn into an independent and resourceful person like Ruth Hall?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)